Use factories to generate JIDs
This commit is contained in:
parent
a11878b139
commit
a990861316
|
@ -30,22 +30,26 @@ public final class Jid {
|
||||||
return IDN.toUnicode(resourcepart);
|
return IDN.toUnicode(resourcepart);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Special private constructor that doesn't do any checking...
|
public Jid fromString(final String jid) throws InvalidJidException {
|
||||||
private Jid(final String localpart, final String domainpart) {
|
return new Jid(jid);
|
||||||
this.localpart = localpart;
|
}
|
||||||
this.domainpart = domainpart;
|
|
||||||
this.resourcepart = "";
|
public static Jid fromParts(final String localpart,
|
||||||
if (localpart.isEmpty()) {
|
final String domainpart,
|
||||||
this.displayjid = domainpart;
|
final String resourcepart) throws InvalidJidException {
|
||||||
|
String out;
|
||||||
|
if (localpart == null || localpart.isEmpty()) {
|
||||||
|
out = domainpart;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
this.displayjid = localpart + "@" + domainpart;
|
out = localpart + "@" + domainpart;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
if (resourcepart != null && !resourcepart.isEmpty()) {
|
||||||
|
out = out + "/" + resourcepart;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
return new Jid(out);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Note: If introducing a mutable instance variable for some reason, make the constructor
|
private Jid(final String jid) throws InvalidJidException {
|
||||||
// private and add a factory method to ensure thread safety and hash-cach-ability (tm).
|
|
||||||
public Jid(final String jid) throws InvalidJidException {
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Hackish Android way to count the number of chars in a string... should work everywhere.
|
// Hackish Android way to count the number of chars in a string... should work everywhere.
|
||||||
final int atCount = jid.length() - jid.replace("@", "").length();
|
final int atCount = jid.length() - jid.replace("@", "").length();
|
||||||
final int slashCount = jid.length() - jid.replace("/", "").length();
|
final int slashCount = jid.length() - jid.replace("/", "").length();
|
||||||
|
@ -118,7 +122,12 @@ public final class Jid {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
public Jid getBareJid() {
|
public Jid getBareJid() {
|
||||||
return displayjid.contains("/") ? new Jid(localpart, domainpart) : this;
|
try {
|
||||||
|
return resourcepart.isEmpty() ? this : fromParts(localpart, domainpart, "");
|
||||||
|
} catch (final InvalidJidException e) {
|
||||||
|
// This should never happen due to the contracts we have in place.
|
||||||
|
return null;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Override
|
@Override
|
||||||
|
@ -133,12 +142,7 @@ public final class Jid {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
final Jid jid = (Jid) o;
|
final Jid jid = (Jid) o;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Since we're immutable, the JVM will cache hashcodes, making this very fast.
|
|
||||||
// I'm assuming Dalvik does the same sorts of optimizations...
|
|
||||||
// Since the hashcode does not include the displayJID it can be used for IDN comparison as
|
|
||||||
// well.
|
|
||||||
return jid.hashCode() == this.hashCode();
|
return jid.hashCode() == this.hashCode();
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@Override
|
@Override
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue